The surprise move comes as the coronavirus outbreak diminishes demand for the troubled company’s shared office space
SoftBank, the Japanese conglomerate, is threatening to withdraw an offer to acquire a much larger stake in We Work, according to a person familiar with the matter. The surprise move comes as the coronavirus outbreak diminishes demand for the troubled company’s shared office space.
SoftBank, the largest outside shareholder in We Work, in October agreed to a multibillion-dollar bailout after the company nearly ran out of cash. As part of the transaction, SoftBank agreed to buy up to $3 billion in stock from existing We Work shareholders, including nearly $1 billion from Adam Neumann, We Work’s co-founder who stepped down as chief executive in September. SoftBank also invested $1.5 billion as part of its rescue package and agreed to lend up to $5 billion to We Work, a commitment that it has not withdrawn.
While SoftBank is still supporting We Work, the possibility that it may own a smaller than expected share of the company could dent confidence in the business at a critical time. As more businesses ask employees to work from home and freelancers choose to avoid shared office spaces, We Work could, over time, lose many of its paying customers.
In a letter sent to We Work shareholders Tuesday, SoftBank offered several reasons the deal might not go through by its scheduled April 1 closing date, according to the person familiar with the matter. Among the reasons SoftBank cited were investigations into We Work by the Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission and attorneys general in New York and California. The two sides have also failed to agree on the terms for consolidating a We Work joint venture in China.
A We Work representative declined to comment. News of SoftBank’s threat was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Neumann left We Work as it was trying to salvage an initial public offering, which it later withdrew. Investors balked at his leadership and transactions We Work did with him that created potential conflicts of interest.
The terms of the rescue agreement were not made public. Going into the deal, Neumann had a strong hand because he was the largest individual shareholder in the company, and his shares entitled him to more than one vote each on corporate decisions. The person familiar with the letter said Neumann transferred his votes to We Work’s board in return for a $185 million payment that was agreed to last year.
Still, as recently as December a SoftBank executive said it was important for the conglomerate to amass a bigger stake in We Work.
“In order for us to have the economic interest that we want, we have to buy shares,” Marcelo Claure, We Work’s executive chairman and a senior SoftBank executive, told The New York Times in December.
SoftBank may have toughened its position as a negotiating tactic to force Neumann and other shareholders to sell their stock for a lower price.
We Work’s business was already facing great uncertainty. The company was set to almost double its locations this year, many of which may not be profitable for months or years. We Work could try to renegotiate leases with landlords, but property owners might not be willing to cut the company a better deal because they are hurting financially themselves and don’t expect an upturn in demand for real estate for the foreseeable future as many white-collar workers are confined to their homes.
©2019 New York Times News Service